Archive for January, 2008

Jan
23
Filed Under (Trading Links) by CondorTrader on 23-01-2008


Jan
23
Filed Under (Market commentary, Trades) by CondorTrader on 23-01-2008

just-want-to-be-wonderful.jpgToday saw an almost 600 point swing in the Dow, which closed up 299 points.  Breadth and volume indicators confirmed today’s reversal, the VIX dropped back to 28, and models started getting paid in US dollars again (not really).

The one downer today was the NDX.  Although the Nasdaq didn’t close green, the index almost completely closed the gap between yesterday’s close and this morning’s open, and obviously would’ve pulled much higher if not for Apple’s earnings disappointment. AAPL was off 10% today, closing at levels not seen since last October.  GOOG was down over 6% today, probably due to nervousness over upcoming earnings.

Needless to say, we now have a slightly larger cushion in our February DIA trade, which is now trading for exactly the price at which we entered. We will continue to monitor our open position and to look for appropriate opportunities for March positions. If the markets can stabilize here and then move a bit higher, we may be able to hold our February trade through a longer cycle.

But note that one day’s rally doesn’t change anything.  This is a short-term bounce, not a change of trend, and we expect to visit yesterday’s lows again in the coming weeks or months.



Jan
22
Filed Under (Trading Links) by CondorTrader on 22-01-2008


Jan
21
Filed Under (Market commentary, Options Education, Volatility) by CondorTrader on 21-01-2008

joy-division.jpgThere’s an AP article out today titled, “Wall Street Braces for More Volatility“. The subtitle is: “This Week Brings Wall Street More Earnings, but It Could Be Months Before Volatility Subsides.” Given that it’s the Associated Press, it’s not fair to expect any sparkling VIX or options commentary, but still, it’s weird that the word “volatility” doesn’t appear in the body of the article - only in those titles. Rather, the rest of the piece is about the recent selling, the possibility of bad earnings over the coming weeks, and recession.

But what do any of those macroeconomic stories have to do with volatility? Well, nothing, necessarily. People seem to be equating “volatility” with “selling”. But that’s not quite right. Volatility is:

1. A statistical measure of the dispersion of returns for a given security or market index. Volatility can either be measured by using the standard deviation or variance between returns from that same security or market index. Commonly, the higher the volatility, the riskier the security.
…In other words, volatility refers to the amount of uncertainty or risk about the size of changes in a security’s value. A higher volatility means that a security’s value can potentially be spread out over a larger range of values. This means that the price of the security can change dramatically over a short time period in either direction. A lower volatility means that a security’s value does not fluctuate dramatically, but changes in value at a steady pace over a period of time. [Investopedia]

So when an underlying stock or index goes straight up, it’s not volatile.  And when it goes straight down (like the major indexes have done so far this year), that’s not volatility.  That’s just selling.  On the general definition, you’ve got to actually have some movement in more than one direction before you can call it volatility.  Normally, any serious selling is accompanied by a VIX spike - that’s what forms this selling=volatility notion in people’s minds - and the reason for that VIX spike is typically increased put buying.  But if the VIX doesn’t rise and markets don’t bounce around (but instead just go straight up or down), there’s no relevant sense in which you can use the v-word.



Jan
20
Filed Under (Trading Links) by CondorTrader on 20-01-2008